Death By Association
One of the most alluring, elusive, and ultimately frustrating aspects of religion is the notion human beings are able to “effect” an intent upon the order of the universe by sheer will and determination. Many people believe, if they pray and are steadfast in their conviction, the Almighty will work His magic toward the ends intended by the prayor. In contrast, some believe, while they may pray and petition the great Cosmos for a desired outcome within a certain set of circumstances, if what happens falls outside of what might be considered as a logical “answer” to the request, there “must be” some unknown design behind the ultimate happening which, must assuredly explain the course of events. Then there are some who look at the whole process as crap, or just don’t give a crap at all.
While I am personally somewhere between crap, design, and desire, I think this kind of thought process puts “average” people in a dangerous position of association, completely out of touch with the purpose of religion in the first place. Let me explain:
Unless a person lives in a culture absolutely free of religious influences, from the time a person is born until the time they die, there is a sort of ingrained stigmata left to the individual to sort out — one that sets the “modern” human apart from the animal. The “modern” stigmata of religion in general is, in large part, an unsaid obligation of individuals to adopt the wounds of their own particular group, based on any number of transgressions communally understood to have been inflicted, is currently being inflicted, or might at some point be inflicted, on the group. Regardless of the particulars, the obligatory wounds felt by any group, whether environmentally or genetically, result in a series of associations within the individuals within said group, based summarily in the group consensus.
To be put bluntly, racism is the offspring of individuals within groups who feel biased against racially; socialism is the offspring of individuals within groups who feel biased against socially; capitalism is the offspring of individuals within groups who feel biased against capitally; etc, etc, etc.
What does that have to do with “association?”
Primarily, people who believe in and embrace the aspirations of ideas regarding a higher power tend to be trusting, well-intentioned, “average” human beings: content to mull about their own particular circumstances, in the understanding that life’s events are, hopefully and by some “greater” design, not just some big, Cosmic joke. Because of this belief that All is not just some big Joke, people have a tendency to try to understand things mathematically.
If I do “X,” it should result in “Y,” which will ultimately cause “Z” to occur.
For example: “If I piss on the front lawn, it might offend my neighbors, and I might very well be arrested!” While this example is logical, this is the very kind of association that becomes dangerous in terms of spirituality or religion. There are some who are convinced: “If I detonate a bomb on my person in a place crowded with people I disagree with, I will kill a number of them, and it might please my God.” Similarly, some people believe: “If I pray real hard, my God will hear my petition, and grant my request.”
People become deluded in this equation of intent-cause-effect, when it comes to religion and spirituality.
I have myself become deluded in many ways, often wondering, “If I’m doing what I believe is right, and what I do does not conflict with what I believe, why do I not see what I believe to be a successful result?” When it’s all boiled down, this is the ultimate quandary of us all. In seeking an explanation for this particular quandary of intent-cause-effect, we are often shocked and disappointed as to the lack of an answer. Such lack of an acceptable answer leads us down paths of seeking alternate justice, from whatever source we feel we can stir up: politics, family, and especially religion.
We “modern” human beings are slowly killing ourselves with the belief that our beliefs (or lack thereof) are going to save us. Maybe it’s all “hogwash,” but I addressed that last time.









RSS, Atom, more...

































2009/10/17 09:00 -0700Z
Religion is there because it meets its followers’ needs. It makes me wonder why you are questioning it in this way. What do you get out of it - the questioning?
Religion provides the sense of a group. It provides rationalisations for the instinct to pray. It provides lifelong parenthood in the form of a father-God, or mother-God if that’s what one prefers. It provides a rationale for disapproving of whatever it is one disapproves of. And so on.
But it only works because it provides a common framework and language for what people feel already. If it doesn’t fit for you, leave it!
Do you have a problem with your beliefs? Beliefs don’t have much to do with religion. Religion has to do with what people get out of religion. the beliefs are just something to hold it together. You pay lip-service to them and then you can join the club.
2009/10/19 09:29 -0700Z
What do I get out of questioning? From a tangible perspective, I don’t get much of anything, I suppose. I don’t receive money. I don’t receive affiliations that improve my social status. I’m not out to build some “new” religion, as you’ve suggested before.
I do get some sincere responses from others in the form of comments on the blog, which results in the intangible benefit of having engaged in fellowship with other people who consider these kinds of topics on an intellectual and philosophical level, vice just a reactionary or emotional level.
Religion does serve as a venue for community in a similar sense, for people who seek such community. But I am still seeking the source — the unseen, unknown, yet repeatedly evident higher power that drives people to religion and spiritual practices in the first place, all across the world in all kinds of settings.
2009/11/16 15:09 -0700Z
in my experience with religion prayer has been more of a selfish exercise in making requests, usually because people feel uncomfortable with what “is”… arguing with reality and wanting it to be other than it is makes them suffer… when they suffer they turn to the God they have fashioned in their imagination with the expectation that He will make it all better for them, and making it all better for them means doing what they want Him to do or think he should do or doing for them what it is they think they deserve because in their mind they’ve done everything “right”…
is there something deeper that drives people sourceward, deeper than their selfish desires and sense of entitlement?… i think there is… if there weren’t “something” deeper people would have given up on religion a long time ago when the majority of their petitions were “answered” in ways they didn’t want or expect… so, what keeps people so committed?… i think it’s deeper than their petty differences and prejudices and fears… i prefer to look past the ways we all get lost and confused in the “matter” of things, some are more lost in it than others and to more of an extreme than others, but what if we were all to look deeper at one another and challenge ourselves to look more deeply into ourselves, beyond our own personal confusion and bias… to fix our eyes on what that common “something” is we’re all reaching toward, and sometimes just don’t know how… what if we all did for one another… what if we all did that for ourselves? …